Number of the records: 1  

Judicial deference in international adjudication

  1. SYS0042332
    LBL
      
    00000nam-a22^^^^^3i-4500
    003
      
    CZ-BrUSC
    005
      
    20201112133353.0
    007
      
    ta
    008
      
    200415s2020----xxk||||||||||-||1-||eng-d
    020
      
    $a 978-1-50993-228-3 $q (vázáno)
    040
      
    $a BOE020 $b cze $e rda
    084
      
    $a JU $2 usbr
    100
    1-
    $7 us_us_auth*0019368 $a Fahner, Johannes Hendrik, $d 1988- $4 aut
    245
    10
    $a Judicial deference in international adjudication : $b a comparative analysis / $c Johannes Hendrik Fahner
    250
      
    $a First edition
    264
    -1
    $a Oxford : $b Hart Publishing, $c 2020
    300
      
    $a xxxv, 270 stran
    336
      
    $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
    337
      
    $a bez média $b n $2 rdamedia
    338
      
    $a svazek $b nc $2 rdacarrier
    490
    1-
    $a Studies in international law ; $v Volume 78
    500
      
    $a Rejstřík
    504
      
    $a Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy
    520
      
    $a International adjudicators are more and more often requested to pass judgement on matters that are traditionally considered to fall within the domestic jurisdiction of States. Especially in the fields of human rights, trade, and investment law, international tribunals are now commonly required to evaluate decisions of national authorities that have been made in the due course of democratic procedures and public deliberation. This raises the question of whether international adjudicators should review such decisions de novo or whether they should give deference to domestic authorities. In many national legal orders, courts do not exercise de novo review with regard to legislative and administrative decisions, as this would allow them to supplant the powers of other branches of government. Instead, courts exercise only deferential forms of review, limiting the intensity of their review by giving special weight to the determinations made by the institution under review. This book investigates whether international courts and tribunals have also adopted deferential standards of review and whether they should do so.
    563
      
    $a váz.
    650
    04
    $7 us_us_auth*z0001363 $a Mezinárodní soudy
    650
    04
    $7 us_us_auth*z0001362 $a Mezinárodní soudnictví
    650
    04
    $7 us_us_auth*z0001360 $a Mezinárodní soudní proces
    650
    04
    $7 us_us_auth*z0003161 $a Soudní proces
    650
    04
    $7 us_us_auth*z0004039 $a Vztah vnitrostátního a mezinárodního práva
    650
    04
    $7 us_us_auth*0008678 $a Uznání
    650
    04
    $7 us_us_auth*0011262 $a Uznání rozhodnutí
    830
    -0
    $7 us_us_auth*0000256 $a Studies in international law (Hart Publishing) ; $v Volume 78

Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.